Skip to main content

The XL Ranch Indian Reservation dispute, 1969-02-03

 Item — Box: 67, Folder: 12
Identifier: CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0001
The XL Ranch Indian Reservation dispute
The XL Ranch Indian Reservation dispute
George F. Duke, director of the California Indian Legal Services, writes to Congressman John N. Happy Camp to urge him to reject an amendment proposed by the Department of the Interior. The amendment would designate the XL Ranch Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association as the sole beneficiary of the XL Ranch Indian Reservation, instead of the Pit River Indian Tribe. Duke argues that the Pit River Indians have not been given a fair chance to be heard in the matter, and that the proposed amendment would deprive them of their rights.

Dates

  • 1969-02-03

Extent

2 pages

Overview

91st (1969-1971)

Preservica Internal URL

Preservica Public URL Preservica Access

Related Materials

Modoc Indians

General

Native Americans; Civil Rights and Liberties; Minority Issues
  • TypeCollection

Repository Details

Part of the Carl Albert Center Congressional and Political Collections Repository

Contact:
630 Parrington Oval
Room 202B
Norman Oklahoma 73109 United States