Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search results

Box 8

 Container

Contains 12 Collections and/or Records:

Interior and Insular Affairs, Committee on: Colorado River Basin, Correspondence and Materials, A-H, 1955-1956

 File — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_0000
Scope and Contents Including 2 cubic feet of material, the legislative series is arranged alphabetically by committee name and contains correspondence, bills, and reports. Prominent subjects in this series include agriculture legislation and federal aid to Oklahoma education.

Aspinall, Wayne, 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_1
Scope and Contents Regarding whether Wickersham will be available to vote for the Colorado River Project; a factual booklet on the Colorado River Storage Project; appreciation for support and favorable vote on the Upper Colorado River legislation.

Campbell, W. Glenn, 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_2
Scope and Contents Copy of the American Enterprise Association's booklet on the Upper Colorado Reclamation Project.

Carr, Larry, 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_3

Dawson, William A., 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_5
Scope and Contents A map of the Colorado River Storage Project that might prove helpful during discussion of H. R. 3383; note of appreciation for Wickersham's vote in favor of the Upper Colorado River Storage Project.

Dixon, H. A., 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_6

Fernandez, A. M., 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_7
Scope and Contents Plea for vote in favor of the rule to bring the Upper Colorado River Storage Bill to the floor for debate.

Haley, James A., 1956

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_8

Hosmer, Craig, 1955

 Item — Box: 8, Folder: 43
Identifier: CAC_CC_056_3_8_43_9
Scope and Contents Opposed to H. R. 3383 because of the many bad features it contains; photographs emphasizing only two of the many reasons why the project should be defeated.