Scope and Contents Cand. says that nuclear waste wouldn't be in Idaho if Larry Craig had been doing his job.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Cand. doesn't trust Craig and Gingrich because they oppose min. wage increase, favor cuts to education to give wealthy a tax break.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Cand. opposes nuclear waste dumping in Idaho as well as Congressional pay raises.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Cand. opposes defending foreign countries with U.S. money and then letting them ship their nuclear waste to Idaho.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Cand. wants to invest in education, strengthen math and science teaching, open doors to college. Opponent voted to cut education.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Opponent supports shipping nuclear waste to Idaho. Cand. is against shipping nuclear waste to Idaho.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Opponent supports nuclear waste in Idaho. Cand. opposes nuclear waste in Idaho.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Opponent lied about cand. campaign contributors while opponent campaign is being funded by tobacco pals. Cand. opposes all tobacco money.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Opponent takes money from nuclear and tobacco PALs for campaign, while the majority of Minnick's contributors are from Idaho.; Notes:

Scope and Contents Opponent lied about nuclear waste and raising own pay and edited tape to make it appear as if Minnick wanted to leave nuclear waste in Idaho.; Notes: